[Rovernet] not Facebook
Steven Dibdin
sdibdin at gmail.com
Sun Dec 27 18:50:23 EST 2015
I've got to agree. RoverNet is a great resource, however, the limitation in not being able to share links or images seriously stymies communication. I think FB makes the natural progression of RN. I'm already a member of the Classic Rover Forum (a stand alone site) and a few P6 related FB pages. I think RoverNet's mainly NADA based knowledge would be a good complement to the others.
Best,
Steven
Sent from a small screen, please excuse any typing errors.
> On Dec 27, 2015, at 16:05, GeffMcCarthy via Rovernet <rovernet at rovernet.org> wrote:
>
> Rovernet is very useful. However the inability to post links or photos
> limits its utility. FB would be better, IMHO.
>
> AvMedSafe
> Geoffrey W. McCarthy MD MBA DipAvMed
> 677 NW Melinda Ave Portland OR USA 97210
> 503-241-8468(h) 503-799-3809 (mobile)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rovernet [mailto:rovernet-bounces at rovernet.org] On Behalf Of British
> Rover via Rovernet
> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2015 10:48 AM
> To: Rovernet <rovernet at rovernet.org>
> Cc: British Rover <britishrover at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Rovernet] not facebook
>
> Rovernet has served Well, with Much Respect! Especially when there was
> nothing years ago, however Good to Valuable info, and Pictures, are Always
> Getting Scrubbed! Time for a change.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rovernet mailing list
> Rovernet at rovernet.org
> http://rovernet.org/mailman/listinfo/rovernet_rovernet.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rovernet mailing list
> Rovernet at rovernet.org
> http://rovernet.org/mailman/listinfo/rovernet_rovernet.org
More information about the Rovernet
mailing list