[Rovernet] 2000TC Flywheel - Clutch burned out

larry williamson lewill4756 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 25 12:34:35 EDT 2025


I must back out of this conversation. My three are for inertia type
starters.sorry. brain fog today. Larry

On Mon, Aug 25, 2025, 10:26 AM Robert Ruggeri via Rovernet <
rovernet at rovernet.org> wrote:

> Then, Larry, I'll take the best one you have if the ring gear faces the
> engine. According to Pierre I don't need to have bevel teeth after all
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Rovernet <rovernet-bounces at rovernet.org> on behalf of Vern
> Inkspot via Rovernet <rovernet at rovernet.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, August 25, 2025 12:22:22 PM
> *To:* Rovernet <rovernet at rovernet.org>
> *Cc:* Vern Inkspot <vern at inkspotco.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Rovernet] 2000TC Flywheel - Clutch burned out
>
> .927” is the minimum thickness. New thickness .952”
>
> Yours
> Vern
>
> On Aug 25, 2025, at 9:18 AM, larry williamson via Rovernet <
> rovernet at rovernet.org> wrote:
>
> I have 3 hanging the wall. I am not a mechanic ,but they all look good.
> Does anyone know the minimum thickness? Larry
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025, 10:02 AM Robert Ruggeri via Rovernet <
> rovernet at rovernet.org> wrote:
>
> As always, thank you very much. My mechanic here in the Us, who's worked
> on British cars all his life, says that the ring gears on MGg's and
> Triumphs etc were always beveled regardless of the starter. I take it that
> this is something unique to Rovers?
>
> Regardless, any chance you have a flywheel that faces the engine even if
> ring gear isn't beveled?
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Rovernet <rovernet-bounces at rovernet.org> on behalf of pierre
> janusz via Rovernet <rovernet at rovernet.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, August 25, 2025 11:49:13 AM
> *To:* Robert Ruggeri via Rovernet <rovernet at rovernet.org>
> *Cc:* pierre janusz <pjemail at aol.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Rovernet] 2000TC Flywheel - Clutch burned out
>
> Dear Robert,
>
> I think that you are getting too hung up on the question of bevelling of
> the teeth. A 1971 car will have a pre-engaged starter motor which means
> that it does not start turning until the gear has moved so as to engage
> with the teeth on the ring gear. This means that there is no need for
> bevelling on the teeth on the ring gear and flywheels and their associated
> ring gear do not have any bevelling. The bevelling is only needed with an
> inertia starter where the gear on the starter motor flies into the ring
> gear after it has already started to turn, and the bevelling is needed to
> cushion the blow.
>
> Pierre
>
> On Monday 25 August 2025 at 16:41:38 BST, Robert Ruggeri via Rovernet <
> rovernet at rovernet.org> wrote:
>
>
> Okay. Anybody have a used flywheel for a 71 Federal series 2 2000 TC?
> Mechanic says the teeth have to be beveled and they have to face the engine.
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Robert Ruggeri <robert.ruggeri.esq at outlook.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 20, 2025 3:33:00 PM
> *To:* Rovernet <rovernet at rovernet.org>
> *Subject:* RE: [Rovernet] 2000TC Flywheel - Clutch burned out
>
>
> *Hi All:*
>
> *Clutch on 71 Series II Federal 2000TC P6 is burned up.   Mechanic says
> that the clearance on the pressure plate is too big, but is not sure which
> part is responsible.*
>
> *Problem might also be that the flywheel was turned too much during an
> earlier repair.   Can source a new one at Win’s, but we need one where the
> beveled teeth on the ring gear are facing the engine.  Win’s is facing the
> other way.*
>
> *Anyone have the right flywheel or any advice?*
>
>
> *Bob*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rovernet mailing list
> Rovernet at rovernet.org
> http://rovernet.org/mailman/listinfo/rovernet_rovernet.org
> _______________________________________________
> Rovernet mailing list
> Rovernet at rovernet.org
> http://rovernet.org/mailman/listinfo/rovernet_rovernet.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rovernet mailing list
> Rovernet at rovernet.org
> http://rovernet.org/mailman/listinfo/rovernet_rovernet.org
>
>
> [image: E-mail Signature logo.png]
> inkspotco.com · 250 864 5619 · in at inkspotco.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rovernet mailing list
> Rovernet at rovernet.org
> http://rovernet.org/mailman/listinfo/rovernet_rovernet.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rovernet.org/pipermail/rovernet_rovernet.org/attachments/20250825/c6ad66ba/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: E-mail Signature logo.png
Type: image/png
Size: 22660 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://rovernet.org/pipermail/rovernet_rovernet.org/attachments/20250825/c6ad66ba/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: E-mail Signature logo.png
Type: image/png
Size: 22660 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://rovernet.org/pipermail/rovernet_rovernet.org/attachments/20250825/c6ad66ba/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the Rovernet mailing list