[Rovernet] Fwd: Message from British European Motors

[Ben Saunders]

Keep in mind that the from 70 to 0 the 2000 TC NADA with twin boosters 
out stopped the 3500 by 30 feet. The biggest problem with the 3055 
system is the long travel of the vacuum lines and vacuum leaks where the 
2000 had the vacuum  switch at each booster. I also found out that there 
are bolt holes at the front inner fenders on both sides for mounting the 
remote vacuum boosters.

On 9/14/22 9:18 AM, pierre janusz via Rovernet wrote:
> I would recommend sticking with the original booster design. What is 
> supposed to be better about the one he is suggesting? Going back to a 
> 1962 design sounds a bit retrograde to me.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Present via Rovernet <rovernet at rovernet.org>
> To: rovernet at rovernet.org <rovernet at rovernet.org>
> CC: Jonathan Present <present.jonathan at gmail.com>; Nelson O’riley 
> <p4roverman at yahoo.com>
> Sent: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 0:10
> Subject: [Rovernet] Fwd: Message from British European Motors
>
> My Mechanic claims this is a better brake booster for my 1970 Rover 3500
>
> Comments are appreciated
>
>>
>> 		
>>
>> 	
>> 	
>>
>>
>> 	
>> Hey Jonathan , the booster was a generic for Jaguar MKII in the year 
>> of 1962 ish
>> 	
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 	
>> 	
>> 		
>>
>> logo Powered by Thryv 
>> <http://clickme.thryv.com/ls/click?upn=fHKPnFw6GvKp0GbeKQ1cWR9AcVBVuibxxUeVbv2doK-2F1Sqr59WgxkrGeiGexN-2FmpLai-2Fg5dfC4KLjEsGD33AyZb-2BLRN4BKLV8Q71T-2BhoMkSwvIcbRW0neJCQmj-2Fs5qIvvkqB_cBqmxdMIuYikJN6Nu-2Fc6YrrTunRyIMISXaVbM04tZliEK9B-2BhmkR2Aq2pp1C1QhOxEMEG5-2Bp9mMhhVzE-2BchFML2BP5r2COCycWkNZhnUi8LKqFZ8gqA1B-2BW-2FasRMo-2FJZlg-2Fo0JivOCiG8cUG8i1ESuBium8FpCEfBc14OUQAJEwO31AhR2xBxvPmt3YIepU5XLT0CbwBLsuBWpdY3X-2FL9VZ8Stt9JPew4m1GfKu9SEIRbRLJf6acQc74YQtkxH0mct5QcXHQ-2FzWZufvU52BJFZnHIviE00-2BSjfrOHPM-2BOsDqMHmmzy5tdP3RCEqlZRSXDB5u8CzlEoCWiSbaFET82NlUMw-2BLNh61JkjD-2FQVC6ng-3D> 
>> 	
>> 	
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Rovernet mailing list
> Rovernet at rovernet.org <mailto:Rovernet at rovernet.org>
> http://rovernet.org/mailman/listinfo/rovernet_rovernet.org 
> <http://rovernet.org/mailman/listinfo/rovernet_rovernet.org>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rovernet mailing list
> Rovernet at rovernet.org
> http://rovernet.org/mailman/listinfo/rovernet_rovernet.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rovernet.org/pipermail/rovernet_rovernet.org/attachments/20220914/7c490dfb/attachment.html>